I am just return­ing from the Euro­bike in Friedrichshafen, the major fair for bicycles.

On the one hand, I am fas­ci­nated by the boom of e-bikes - includ­ing all the "elec­tronic tun­ing" oppor­tu­ni­ties. On the other hand, I am deeply dis­ap­pointed by the motor, bat­tery and con­troller com­bi­na­tions that form a com­pletely pro­pri­etary system.

Imag­ine you wish to go to work by bike but do not want to increase your heart beat above 140bpm to avoid sweat­ing. The  e-motor sup­ports you as soon as go close to the set thresh­old. With the e-bike you could do imple­ment "chip-tuning" to increase the max­i­mum speed as seen in cars. You could down­load a route with the alti­tude pro­file and see if cur­rent bat­tery power will be suf­fi­cient to take you to the des­ti­na­tion (here lies the link to OSM).

E-bikes are still at an early stage but sales fig­ures are steadily grow­ing and the typ­i­cal early stage prob­lems seem to get sorted. The acu­a­tion unit - includ­ing the elec­tronic con­troller - comes from a hand­ful of providers, with Pana­sonic as the mar­ket leader. Bosch informed me that they are not plan­ning to pro­vide any access - not even read-only - to their sys­tem. If you are fac­ing a prob­lem you have to go an autho­rized dealer who has a diag­nos­tic unit to read out the mem­ory of the con­troller - the same closed world as we know it from the auto­mo­tive industry.

Wouldn't it be cool if the firmware of the elec­tronic con­troller could be replaced with an Open Source firmware? The same way as I can replace the some of the WLAN-Router firmware with Open Source solu­tions like Open­WRT or Tomato. Then you could link your smart­phone to your e-bike and access all the rel­e­vant infor­ma­tion or tune it through apps.

I would be will­ing to orga­nize a hack-day or sup­port (finan­cially) ini­tia­tives if any­body comes up with some good ideas to 'hijack' one or the other e-bike con­troller so that a smart­phone con­nec­tion can be estab­lished. Let me know what you think!

{ 5 comments }

Thoughts

Two extreme approaches towards community maps

July 13, 2011
Thumbnail image for Two extreme approaches towards community maps

There are sev­eral approaches to com­mu­nity maps in the wild. The two extreme approaches are Open­StreetMap and Google with Map Maker. Open­StreetMap with free map data in mind Open­StreetMap has started with a blank map and fully con­cen­trated on map­pers to achieve a crit­i­cal mass of con­trib­u­tors and map data. The trig­ger of the project was to [...]

Read the full article →
Analysis

Map data? Who cares?

July 4, 2011
Thumbnail image for Map data? Who cares?

If you  were to look at how deci­sions about the usage of maps are made then you may say that most users, and even devel­op­ers, have no clue about the source of the under­ly­ing map data of a map or a map ser­vice. Devel­op­ers decide on a map/location API that they want to use as [...]

Read the full article →
Thoughts

What makes OpenStreetMap special?

June 17, 2011

The phe­nom­ena of crowd­sour­ing does work. This can be seen in the exam­ple of Wikipedia. Open­StreetMap is a crowd­sourced map that has gen­er­ated sig­nif­i­cant trac­tion. Many peo­ple see Open­StreetMap as just another map that is “free”. How­ever, there is much more to it than that. I want to high­light three aspects that make Open­StreetMap unique [...]

Read the full article →
Thoughts

What makes OpenStreetMap appealing for developers?

June 15, 2011
Thumbnail image for What makes OpenStreetMap appealing for developers?

Open­StreetMap is the No. 1 map data provider, espe­cially in the aca­d­e­mics envi­ron­ment. It is also more and more becom­ing the pre­ferred solu­tion when more sophis­ti­cated inter­ac­tions with a map are required. All of the map APIs from the large play­ers like Google and Bing are very lim­ited when more sophis­ti­cated loca­tion ser­vices are developed. [...]

Read the full article →
News

OSMF meet-up in London this Sunday. See you there!

June 9, 2011

Hi, if you are in Lon­don or nearby this Sun­day you should take the oppor­tu­nity and join the open OSMF-session:  This is your chance to dis­cuss the license, SOTM, fund­ing or any­thing else in per­son! From 5p.m. onwards we are happy to offer you a beer. See you on Sun­day, Oliver Update: See my images from [...]

Read the full article →
Thoughts

Do OpenStreetMap data consumers belong to the OSM community?

June 4, 2011
Thumbnail image for Do OpenStreetMap data consumers belong to the OSM community?

Open­StreetMap has always been about cre­at­ing maps. From the begin­ning, it makes sense: you must cre­ate a map (or col­lect map data) before you can use it. In many areas Open­StreetMap has reached a level where it can eas­ily com­pete with com­mer­cial maps or is even supe­rior. The lat­ter is espe­cially true for foot­path and [...]

Read the full article →
Thoughts

Could a less restrictive share-alike license give OpenStreetMap data a boost?

May 20, 2011

The cor­po­rate world has expe­ri­enced wide adop­tion of Open Source libraries with the intro­duc­tion of the less restric­tive LGPL license.  The ques­tion is; if a less restric­tive share-alike license (ODbL or CC-BY-SA) could expe­ri­ence a sim­i­lar adop­tion in the cor­po­rate world and whether this would result in either accel­er­ated growth of map data and/or lead [...]

Read the full article →
Thoughts

OpenStreetMap and Indoor Maps

May 14, 2011
Thumbnail image for OpenStreetMap and Indoor Maps

Time and again in recent days, I have been won­der­ing if and how indoor maps will fit into the Open­StreetMap project. Indoor maps require maps on top of each other to deal with floors. Tech­ni­cally, this is eas­ily pos­si­ble as long as the maps them­selves remain 2D. How­ever, there are a few ques­tions that have [...]

Read the full article →
Zeitgeist

Where2.0 sentiments: crowdsourcing is the way to go for map makers

May 3, 2011
Thumbnail image for Where2.0 sentiments: crowdsourcing is the way to go for map makers

When I first was reflect­ing on the Where2.0 2011 con­fer­ence, I had the impres­sion that there were no real high­lights and hardly any new trends. Navteq was announc­ing their 3D cities in an attempt to catch up with Google. Microsoft are advanc­ing their map tech­nol­ogy and announc­ing some major play­ers are to switch from Google [...]

Read the full article →